Looking for you 26 Ottawa 26

Added: Dreama Rossman - Date: 11.07.2021 04:05 - Views: 24562 - Clicks: 5312

Study objective: To conduct an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis of implementation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in emergency departments in the United States and Canada. De: A decision analytic approach to technology assessment. Clinical decision rules that allow physicians to be more selective in their use of radiography were compared with current practice in a decision analytic model.

Setting: A university hospital adult ED. Participants: ED physicians instructed in the use of the Ottawa Ankle Rules for adult patients with ankle injury. : Radiography, waiting time, lost productivity, and medicolegal costs were calculated. One- and two-way sensitivity analyses that varied the rate of missed fractures, cost of radiography, probability of lawsuits, and cost of lawsuits did not change the substantially.

Conclusion: Implementation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules would result in ificant savings of health care dollars despite the cost of missed fractures including litigation costs. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features! Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable. Search: Search. Advanced Clipboard. Display options Display options. Create file Cancel. citation Subject: 1 selected item: - PubMed. Format: Summary Summary text Abstract Abstract text. MeSH and other data. Send Cancel. Add to Collections Create a new collection Add to an existing collection.

Name your collection: Name must be less than characters. Choose a collection: Unable to load your collection due to an error Please try again. Add Cancel. Add to My Bibliography My Bibliography. Unable to load your delegates due to an error Please try again. Your saved search Name of saved search:. Search terms:. Test search terms. Would you like updates of new search ? : change. Frequency: Monthly Weekly Daily. Which day? Send at most: 1 item 5 items 10 items 20 items 50 items items items. Send even when there aren't any new .

Optional text in :. Save Cancel. Create a file for external citation management software Create file Cancel. of items displayed: 5 10 15 20 50 Create RSS Cancel. RSS Link Copy. Full text links Cite Display options Display options. Abstract Study objective: To conduct an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis of implementation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in emergency departments in the United States and Canada.

Similar articles Implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules. Stiell IG, et al. Evaluation of the Ottawa clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle and midfoot injuries in the emergency department: an independent site assessment. Pigman EC, et al.

Ann Emerg Med. PMID: Radiography in acute ankle injuries: the Ottawa Ankle Rules versus local diagnostic decision rules. Pijnenburg AC, et al. Acute ankle injuries: clinical decision rules for radiographse. Tandeter HB, Shvartzman P. Tandeter HB, et al. Am Fam Physician. PMID: Review. Ramasubbu B, et al. Pediatr Emerg Care. See all similar articles. Cited by 17 articles Evaluation the accuracy and cost effectiveness of using the Bernese and Ottawa rules in ankle Sprain. Zia Ziabari SM, et al. Int J Burns Trauma. Lavrador Filho JM, et al. Rev Bras Ortop Sao Paulo. Epub Apr Methodological standards for the development and evaluation of clinical prediction rules: a review of the literature.

Cowley LE, et al. Diagn Progn Res. Diagnosis and treatment of ankle syndesmosis injuries with associated interosseous membrane injury: a current concept review. Yu GS, et al. Int Orthop. Epub Aug Development of a clinical decision support tool for diagnostic imaging use in patients with low back pain: a study protocol. Hayden JA, et al. See all "Cited by" articles. Publication types Comparative Study Actions. MeSH terms Adult Actions. Canada Actions. Cost-Benefit Analysis Actions. Decision Trees Actions. Humans Actions. Probability Actions. Radiography Actions. Sensitivity and Specificity Actions.

Looking for you 26 Ottawa 26

email: [email protected] - phone:(875) 448-5298 x 1802

Cost-effectiveness analysis of the Ottawa Ankle Rules